Saturday, May 4, 2013

Rejection



I've just finished sending out fifty rejection notices for submissions to Fairly Wicked Tales. Yep. Fifty. That may not seem like a lot in the grand scheme of things, especially if you're Ellen Datlow, who's going to have way more to send when subs close for her anthology. But for a small press, it's a lot. And it's not just exhausting for my fingers, it's soul-sucking. Why? Because I'm also an author and I know what getting those rejections is like. I don't enjoy knowing I've made fifty people unhappy today. In fact, I take no pleasure in it at all.

And the team that read these stories put a lot of thought into the Table of Contents for Fairly Wicked Tales. We discussed them, argued over them, and hashed out which ones to go with. Putting an anthology together isn't anything we take lightly. We owe it to ourselves, our readers, and our authors to only choose the best possible stories and put them in a cohesive collection. And that's what I feel we've done.

Unfortunately, rejection is a fact of life for writers and we all have to learn to accept it and move on. So here are a few reasons why you may have received a rejection for your story:

1. The story was good but we received ten of the same theme. Obviously with an anthology, you want a little variety, so I couldn't accept ten "Cinderella" stories. So choosing which one to keep comes down to the most original idea, the most well written, and the one who's tone fits best with the other stories chosen for the anthology.

2. The story had merit and was original, but the tone was off. Maybe the story was too light hearted to fit in amongst the darker stories already accepted. Maybe the story had too much humor, or too much gore, or was aimed at a different age group.

3. Setting. We only accepted stories set in the time period of the original piece. With most fairy tales, that's going to mean the middle ages not today.

4. Maybe it was a good story, but didn't do what the guidelines asked in reversing the characters.

5. And sometimes, well sometimes, its' because the story wasn't as good as it could have been. Perhaps the style wasn't fully developed, or it was too verbose without enough substance, or the writing was not up to the standard of the other stories selected.

There are many reasons for the rejection letters I wrote today, just as there are many reasons other editors write them. So pick yourself up, dust yourself off, go over that story again, and re-submit it elsewhere. Who knows where it's real home is?

Just be happy  someone took the time to read it, discuss it, and write you a letter that wasn't purely form.

Stacey

6 comments:

  1. Thanks Stacey. Writing my little Rumpelstilskin piece inspired me to try a completely different genre and it was a lot of fun....so nothing lost. Who knows, it may some day find another home!

    Becky Pourchot
    www.hungryghostbooks.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. The cartoon is great, but the contents of your post are even better, Stacey. Great job!

    Blaze

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good post, Stacey. It's nice to see editorial concern over rejections now and then. Makes us measly writers feel all over our work is not ending in a black hole somewhere far far away.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for the nicest first rejection I could ever get :)

    - Maya

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's always good to have some insight into the editor's rationale. Does this mean all rejections/acceptances have been sent out?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, all rejections/acceptances have been sent. And I just posted the Table of Contents.

    Thank you, all, for the comments. I just wanted you to know that I understand how bad rejections suck and editors aren't all cold hearted monsters (I've met a few though...). And I wanted to encourage everyone to keep trying. You just never know where a story will find a home.

    Stacey

    ReplyDelete

We love to hear from you! Please leave us a comment!